[ga-abuse] [Fwd: BOUNCE ga-roots@dnso.org]

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Wait just a minute here is Corliss changing the rules again and a
censorship/sanction means more that not being distributed but now means
not part of the official record of a list?

Please someone correct my ignorance, for I truly cannot accept what I
see as the plain words of Mr. Corliss be correct.

---

• To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@corliss.net>
• Subject: Re: BOUNCE ga-roots@dnso.org
• From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
• Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 01:34:32 -0700
• CC: ga-roots@dnso.org
• Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
• References: <200105090428.GAA19457@dnso.dnso.org> <079601c0d84a$40a4de20$8ce9fea9@hamza>

Patrick,

  I think you don't understand how my "Route Around" works Patrick.
All of the subscribers of the ga-Roots are getting my responses...  >;)

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Hi Jeff
>
> You might think you are *routing around the damage* but if you check the
> [ga-roots] mailing list archives you will find they are not getting through.
>
> Or just look below.  Anyway I've done my duty as list supervisor.
>
> What I think is that you are too embarrased to admit you don't really
> understand the way mailing lists work.  I repeat - post to [ga] not
> [ga-roots].
>
> I promise I won't tell anyone ;-)
>
> Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <owner-ga-roots@dnso.org>
> To: <owner-ga-roots@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:28 PM
> Subject: BOUNCE ga-roots@dnso.org: taboo header:
> /^From:.*jwkckid1\@ix\.netcom\.com/i
>
> > >From ga-roots-listadmin@dnso.dnso.org  Wed May  9 06:28:08 2001
> > Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net
> [207.69.200.157])
> > by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA19453
> > for <ga-roots@dnso.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 06:28:07 +0200 (MET DST)
> > Received: from ix.netcom.com (user-33qsd1g.dialup.mindspring.com
> [199.174.52.48])
> > by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA15606;
> > Wed, 9 May 2001 00:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
> > Message-ID: <3AF8E5E6.83A4E214@ix.netcom.com>
> > Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 23:38:31 -0700
> > From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> > Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
> > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win95; U; 16bit)
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@corliss.net>
> > CC: "[ga-roots]" <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> > Subject: Re: [ga-roots] MOTION - Consensus-Based Policy on Alt Roots
> > References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105090259200.95774-100000@pan.bijt.net>
> <05a501c0d835$a83b51a0$8ce9fea9@hamza>
> <2499845888.20010508201332@userfriendly.com>
> <3AF8D66D.F2C8CA3D@ix.netcom.com> <065901c0d83e$bf740e80$8ce9fea9@hamza>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > Patrick and all,
> >
> >   Thank you again for this info.  But I was quite aware none the less.
> > I am routing around the damage, and age old tradition as you know.
> > It is not my fault that the DNSO admin made a mistake now is it.
> >
> > Patrick Corliss wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jeff
> > >
> > > Unless you post to to the main [ga] list your mail will continue to
> bounce.
> > > I have advised you several times but you don't seem to understand.
> > >
> > > However, I am happy to repost the following *bounce* to [ga-roots].
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Alternate Chair
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:32 PM (AEST), Jeff Williams wrote:
> > > To: [ga-roots] <ga-roots@dnso.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [ga-roots] MOTION - Consensus-Based Policy on Alt Roots
> > >
> > > >   IN the form that Patrick has worded his resolution I would have to
> > > > agree with WXW here.  However with some modification and
> > > > if the ICANN BoD would indeed follow all of the precepts of
> > > > RFC1591, which they have already broken with as of the MDR
> > > > decisions for new TLD's, reference to RFC 1591 as part of this
> > > > motion would indeed be illegitimate.  However should the ICANN
> > > > BoD withdraw the new TLD contracts and/or selections, than such
> > > > a resolution with some modification would/could be more reasonably
> > > > considered.
> > > >
> > > >   I would be happy to prepare a draft with this one as a base, that
> > > > would be more proper and have the terms specifics for the
> > > > cooperative requirement with existing "Cooperative Roots" or
> > > > "Alt Roots".
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Patrick Corliss
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

---