Re: [ga-abuse] Re: Warning from the list monitors to Dave Crocker

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>]

Hi Kristy

It's probably better if we don't get into debates on list monitoring
decisions.  If needed that can be done on [ga-int].  It's a no-win situation
trying to justify your viewpoint especially with the person complained
about.

In any case, I do not see it as *your* decision.  The process has been
agreed and all list monitors have approved.

I will write to Dave Crocker accordingly.

Regards
Patrick


----- Original Message -----
From: Kristy McKee <k@widgital.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Cc: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: [ga-abuse] Re: Warning from the list monitors to Dave Crocker


> Dave,
>
> We continue to disagree.  I will not be available for the rest of the day
> and yet, it is very important that you feel good about the situation or
are
> at least okay with it.  Please continue this discussion with the Chair or
> another List Monitor (other than Patrick, as you noted he is not involved
> with the judgment or action due to him being one of the complainants)...
>
> I appreciate you did follow the same rules I agreed to prior to signing up
> to participate for our discussion this morning.  Although our exchange has
> not been pleasant, it has not been unpleasant either.  I hope you are able
> to come to an agreement with one of the other monitors this
> afternoon.  Otherwise, I will available again tomorrow morning to discuss
> this with you.
>
> Thank you for letting me know you prefer our conversation to be public.  I
> did not understand this was necessary and am grateful for your help as I
am
> also for the legal and technical knowledge you have shared with this group
> and others.
>
> Also, this message was written on behalf of Kristy McKee, not the list
> monitors - none of our conversation has been between you and the list
> monitors.  It has been between you and me.  If I had understood you
desired
> to communicate with the list monitors; then I would have arranged for it
to
> happen that way; but you addressed me at my office address after The List
> Monitors sent you a warning and I was confused by that.  Please accept my
> apology.
>
> ~k
>