<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] Re: [ga] NOTICE - List Monitoring
FYI - some interesting observations
reposted with Jefsey's kind permission.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@corliss.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] NOTICE - List Monitoring
I undestand that Members of the DNSO/GA "full" ML
still enjoy discussing with the suspended Members.
Would this be the same on the six new mailing lists
(ie would there be "review" and "full review"?)
Obviously if the suspended Members on the new ML
must come on the full GA to continue discussiing the
new ML topics, most probably he Members of the new
ML will tend to come back on he GA.
Jefsey
PS. Patrick I found a smart way to staff your new lists.
You give a number of order to each one. Then when
Distinguished DNSO/GA Members have exhausted
their GA 5 posts a day allocation, they may swicth to
list 1, then list 2, etc.. with a total capacity of 35 posts
a day at the expense of a minimum of attention from
the readers. I hope this may help.
On 21:33 05/05/01, Patrick Corliss said:
>Chair, Members GA
>
>Six new mailing lists have been created to provide a forum for discussion
by
>working groups prior to the Stockholm meeting early next month. It is
>expected there will be a reasonable amount of flexibility allowed within
>each group to appoint a list moderator or to set its own policies in
>relation to list rules and excess postings.
>
>Until this new environment has been properly established, the List Monitor
>Committee has determined that the existing rules will remain in place on
the
>new lists. An excess posting limit of five daily postings per person will
>therefore apply to each list.
>
>The list monitors have unanimously agreed that persons who have had their
>posting rights withdrawn should continue their suspension for the remainder
>of the term imposed by the former list monitor. This continuing suspension
>will apply to all of the GA lists.
>
>All members are reminded that one of the new lists has been established
>to review the current policies in relation to Internal Processes. This is
>[ga-int]. Until new posting rules are established, any loss of posting
>rights will be imposed across the board.
>
>The Chair has confirmed his acceptance of these procedures pending
>the formulation of new list rules on the Internal Processes list. It is,
of
>course, open to any person with a grievance to submit an appeal to the
>Chair, at any time, for his consideration.
>
>All members interested in providing input to the GA's list rules are
>encouraged to join [ga-int] and participate in that debate.
>
>Thanking you
>Patrick Corliss
>Co-Chair, GA
>for List Monitor Committee
>
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|