RE: [ga-abuse] Eric Diekers Suspension Notice

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Dear Kristy,
All List Monitors,

We are in the implementation phase and we need to be very precise.

1. The List Monitors Team take a decision, concerning an e-mail address
   email@some.where
   1a. The note is prepared, and will be posted by TBD-List Monitor on Duty
       to TBD-List(s)
2. I am requested to set up a filtering on that e-mail address,
   questions:
   2a. How many weeks ? 
   2b. Filtering on which lists ?

Application to a particular case of Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>:
1. e-mail address: <eric@hi-tek.com>
1a: The note will be posted by Kristy ? To ga@dnso.org ? To SIX lists ?
2a: is it 2 weeks ? starting today Friday 4 May, until Friday 18 May, right ?
2b: Filtering on which lists ? ga@dnso.org AND SIX specific ? 

From my side, I keep in each LIST configuration file ONE line related
to a posting rights suspetion:
# May 4, KMC, Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com> 2w until 18 May

Best,
Elisabeth
NB. Do not worry, here it is already AFTER the end of business hours,
    and the start of 4 days long week-end in many places, but I will
    be on line to do your request.
    All Chairs and Alternate know how to reach me on phone in emergency.

--

> From k@widgital.com Fri May  4 17:34 MET 2001
> Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010504103121.0302b6e0@mail.ies.net>
> X-Sender: klr@mail.ies.net
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 10:33:20 -0700
> To: R.Gaetano@iaea.org
> From: k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)
> Subject: RE: [ga-abuse] Eric Diekers Suspension Notice
> Cc: ga-abuse@dnso.org, Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> 
> Yes, Roberto, this is my understanding, here is the note I prepared for 
> Elizabeth:
> 
> Dear Elizabeth,
> 
> The list monitors have come to the unanimous agreement Eric Dierker's 
> suspension will be carried out today.  I have written the approved notice & 
> am prepared to send it to the complainant, cc ga-abuse@dnso.org and 
> ga@dnso.org, regretfully.
> 
> Eric's office is in San Diego, California.  It should be around 8:30 in the 
> morning there right now.  His suspension is "scheduled" to begin sometime 
> today after the group has been notified publicly and suspension should last 
> for two weeks.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ~k
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 05:28 PM 5/4/2001 +0200, R.Gaetano@iaea.org wrote:
> >Kristy,
> >
> > >
> > > If we all agree to this, we'll need to have his privileges
> > > removed before I
> > > send the message to he and the GA tomorrow morning.
> >
> >
> >Are we all in phase on the fact that we need to post the GA (and him)
> >*before* suspending him? Coordination with Elisabeth is necessary to
> >minimize the window between suspension message and right removals, but the
> >latter cannot precede the former.
> >
> >Regards
> >Roberto
> 
>   Kristy McKee 612.823.2418
>   .W I D G I T A L. project dev.
> 
>