Re: [ga-abuse] (Fwd) Re: [ga] Suspension of Voting Rights

[Bruce James <bmjames@swbell.net>]

As a List Monitor, I must recuse myself from this request. I forward this to
the other List Monitors for their action or non-action.

/Bruce-LM


----- Original Message -----
From: "L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>
To: <ga-abuse@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 12:29
Subject: [ga-abuse] (Fwd) Re: [ga] Suspension of Voting Rights


This post is typical of Mr. Crispin and is a direct insult to those who
wish to bring to the list very topical issues facing ICANN wrt to domain
names.

It is obvious that he does not want to address the issues and is
especially interested in preventing the .BIZ issue from being discussed.
However, to accuse those who do feel it is necessary and topical of a
denial of service effort and flooding the list with a paralyzing effect is
in
itself a personal attack on those people.  He does not wish the issue to
be discussed so he attacks those who discuss it with the intention of
advising the board on the topic.  It is not up to Mr. Crispin to determine
the validity of the topic.  As a matter of fact, if the topic is ignored, it
will
result in more problems for ICANN than if it is addressed.

Insults of this nature a common for Mr. Crispin and I feel it is proper and
appropriate to  let him know that it is unacceptable behavior.  It is my
hope that Mr. Crispin will be warned.

Regards,

Leah Gallegos

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:      Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:23:07 -0700
From:           Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To:             ga@dnso.org
Subject:        Re: [ga] Suspension of Voting Rights

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:27:33AM -0500, Bruce James wrote:
> The DNSO is a Cost Center. It was suppose to provide *advice* to the BoD.

Yes, precisely.  However, the GA, at least, has effectively been
captured by delusional people who think that they have much much more
power than simply giving advice.  They swamp the discussions with their
fantasies of being a governing body, and effectively paralyze the GA
(and indirectly, the DNSO), through what is the moral equivalent of a
denial of service attack.  Why should the Board provide funds to
support this attack?

--
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

------- End of forwarded message -------