[ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: [ga] Question No. 1

[Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>]

Is an elected GA official going to be held accountable for making personal 
attacks?  Please note Patrick's opening comment.  That is a personal attack.

This is another formal complaint.

d/

>From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
>To: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
>Cc: "Michael F. McNulty" <mcnulty@AZStarnet.com>, <ga@dnso.org>,
>         "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
>Subject: Re: [ga] Question No. 1
>Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:22:32 +1000
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
>Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
>
>On Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:56 AM (AEST)
>Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>Subject: Re: [ga] Question No. 1
>
>
> > Excellent comparison.  It highlights fundamental misunderstandings about
> > domain names:
> >
> >          Children's names are assumed NOT to be unique.
> >          Domain names MUST be unique.
> >
> > Hence domain name assignment requires a mechanism for ensuring uniqueness.
>
>Hi Dave
>
>You logic never makes sense.  IF domain names MUST be unique then you CANNOT
>have two domain names with the same extension like crocker.biz.
>
>Which means that alternate TLDs either (a) don't exist or (b) are not a 
>problem.
>
>IF domain name assignment MUST have a mechanism for ensuring uniqueness 
>then one
>MUST already exist (that's if domain names MUST be unique in the first place).
>
>Of course, if there is such a mechanism it is singularly ineffective.
>
>Regards
>Patrick Corliss

----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464