[ga-abuse] Re: [ga] something about decorum

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Dear List Monitor

I complain about the following posting by Eric Dierker on the grounds that the
whole document is a slander on my character.  In particular it contains four
unwarranted components:

(1)    distortions
(2)    personal insults
(3)    implied threats
(4)    falsehoods

This document is an unnecessary provocation given my previous response (quoted
below).

Best regards
Patrick Corliss


----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
Cc: [GA] <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] something about decorum


> Thank you I would not respond to you otherwise but you ask my agenda, and I
must
> be given latitude to respond.  Part of my agenda is to stop yours.
>
> Mr. Corliss if you do not know my agenda then you have filtered me.  I do not
> blame you for this but you should not speak of that which you intentionally do
not
> care to be informed about.  OUTREACH, EDUCATION AND MULTILINGUALISM.  There is
no
> opposition or conflict for ICANN in these matters, unlike your agenda which
> includes being a Chevy when ICANN is a ford.
>
> I am also against personal attacks like the one you went way over the line
with,
> your post to Ms. K. in my afternoon.  Some of us made major progress this
> afternoon regardless of the chair election. We are raising awareness.
>
> You come along and complain that posts are made to people who matter like
senators
> who control the purse strings of the DoC, which controls the ICANN contracts.
> >From my feedback from the DoC knowables you caused more damage to ICANN than
20
> Verisign contracts put together today with your display of political abuse.
>
> You convinced many that are in control that there is no control of ICANN.  If
you
> win the election, which you probably will, then that is OK.  ICANNTALK.  I
will
> answer their requests to testify and I will use you as an example of the
problem.
>
> Your agenda is clearly to hurt the bottom up process because there are deals
to be
> made for the "alternatives".  the bottom up is not the sidewise capture. You
have
> just given the tlda a black eye!!!
>
>
>
> Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > Dear Eric
> >
> > I don't know what your agenda is but I don't intend to respond to personal
> > attacks and vague generalisations about my motivations.  I have provided
> > evidence in relation to Jeff Williams which members are able to evaluate.
> >
> > I have already stated my "final word" on my views and do not want to modify
> > those in any way.   Please do not expect me to respond to future
provocations.
> >
> > Yours faithfully
> > Patrick Corliss
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>