[ga-abuse] RE: Re[2]: Abuse complaint [Dave Crocker] - Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Save the rules violation reports for serious violations.  I suggest
reading them for more clarification.

- William,
Please do not insult my intelligence in this way.

Dave Crocker wrote:

> This exchange is an excellent example of pronouncements issued with no
> concern at all about the merits of an issue.
>
> Let's just treat ICANN as a set of abstractions and to hell with any real
> concern for benefits or detriments.
>
> Thanks, folks, for such responsible participation.
>

IMHO, this is a personal attack, insulting to all current participants,
added to which it serves no useful purpose.


I also consider it inappropriate to CC such complaints to the public
list, as it encouraged abusive threads of people who do not like a
particular person or their position to jump on the bandwagon, which is
what was the intent of the original complainant on this thread, btw.

I am my own person and can speak for myself thank you. Bandwagon is not in
my vocabulary. If you haven't noticed by now, I am a leader, not a follower.
Time is too short to waste on this sort of thread, as I have witnessed in
the past repeatedly, and I would note, with you having singled yourself out
as a party to it on this list.

Whatever the intent of the original complainant, it is irrelevant to me. I
seconded it for one reason and one reason only. To support a zero tolerance
policy to disruptive elements, which can only get in the way of substantive
work. Dave Crocker's post was inappropriate. I know better, he knows better,
everybody knows better and that includes you.

Joanna