<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: [ga] Helping the nomination process along [was: Proposal for chair election rules for the GA]
I've been very polite to him, especially since he stepped down from
the IDNO, this was out of line. I've even been very careful to not
even bring up his stepping down from the IDNO, so that he didn't feel
a need to defend himself.
This is a forwarded message
From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
To: ga@dnso.org <ga@dnso.org>
Date: Friday, March 02, 2001, 4:48:27 PM
Subject: [ga] Helping the nomination process along [was: Proposal for chair election rules for the GA]
===8<==============Original message text===============
On 04:46 2/03/01 -0800, William X. Walsh said:
>
>This type of "mass nomination" is counter productive, and is exactly
>what this process does not need.
>
There is no mass nomination. It is in a member's own hands to nominate few
or many.
>Also, listing people without their prior consent is more than a little
>impolite.
>
Pray, Your Politeness, tell us then what this "process" needs. More delay?
What are you afraid of exactly? That the voters do not know who to
nominate? That they do not know who to elect?
Many of those who post here have already made their reputation.
Roberto called for a replacement well before December. It is past time that
this Assembly elects itself a Chair.
This voters list is already published on the DNSO website.
Since no passwords are issued, nobody is being spammed.
--joop
The Polling Booth
http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
===8<===========End of original message text===========
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|