ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-abuse] Re[2]: [ga] Transparency

  • To: Eric Dierker <Eric@Hi-Tek.com>
  • Subject: [ga-abuse] Re[2]: [ga] Transparency
  • From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:33:27 -0800
  • CC: ga-abuse@dnso.org
  • In-reply-To: <3A8791DA.70CC17A4@Hi-Tek.com>
  • References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010211202242.01f35250@feedwriter.com><11917027896.20010211195908@userfriendly.com> <3A877AC8.F9EC636B@Hi-Tek.com><3124268177.20010211215947@userfriendly.com> <3A8782E8.10764820@Hi-Tek.com><6528659805.20010211231258@userfriendly.com> <3A8791DA.70CC17A4@Hi-Tek.com>
  • Reply-To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga-abuse@dnso.org

Consider this a further complaint, not to mention posting a private
message publicly.

Since this is a separate incidence, completely, it qualifies as a
second offense under the rules.

Sunday, February 11, 2001, 11:33:46 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:

> Imagine how foolish I feel putting something so reflective of my views on the list.
> Thank ya for pointint out how silly my beliefs were.  Either back off or take me on.
> You are a man, so am I.  I'll take Joops cause on for fun and kick your ass
> intellectually.  If you swim with synergism I am your best friend, otherwise you are a
> one legged man in my ass kicking contest.  History, technical, political, I now know the
> word as well as you, everything else is opinion.  Leave Joop alone and lets have it, off
> the mailing here should do you proud,,,,,
> All the way off list so there are no rules.

> Let us start off with what a bad person I am, then lets go after your professionalism.


> "William X. Walsh" wrote:

>> Hello Eric,
>>
>> When you are ready to discuss serious matters with the seriousness
>> they warrant, feel free to email me again.
>>
>> Sunday, February 11, 2001, 10:30:01 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>>
>> > You as I expected are all that Sr. Walsh,
>>
>> > So is Sr. Joop.  It is like my parents getting a divorce.  I want to help Joop and
>> > his group and Walsh's independent ideas are always helpful, can't you two just get
>> > along?
>>
>> > Wait you guys are heavy weights. I propose a heavy weigth battle on Sotoris's site
>> > let's do it, I  am sure the Gov. of  Minn. will moderate. "Titans of the Web" . It
>> > could be part of outreach.  I'll set it up and take a commish.  I am now Don King
>> > of the web!
>>
>> > Or maybe not?
>>
>> > Come on put your $$$$$ where your mouth is!!
>>
>> > Ultreya,
>>
>> > "William X. Walsh" wrote:
>>
>> >> Hello Eric,
>> >>
>> >> Sunday, February 11, 2001, 9:55:20 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > What do You want  as against this horrible man?  Why are you so opposed
>> >> > to
>> >> > Joop?
>> >>
>> >> I am not against him, I am against his actions.  I protest ONLY
>> >> against his actions.  Why?  Because he asked me to help him for this
>> >> organization, and as one of those who did, and helped to get the IDNO
>> >> started, I take great exception to what he has done over the last year
>> >> and a half.
>> >>
>> >> Don't just take my word for it.  I would be happy to provide you with
>> >> some reading material in Joop's own archives that point to it.  Go and
>> >> look at what he has done now.  Even his supporters have had their jaws
>> >> dropped at his latest actions:
>> >>
>> >> http://listserver.actrix.co.nz/pipermail/idno-discuss/2001-February/004161.html
>> >>
>> >> > Who do you represent Mr. Walsh?  Give us your full background as
>> >> > you are
>> >> > truly standing in a glass house and casting the stone, oh sinless one.
>> >>
>> >> I represent no one but myself, and what I think is right and just.  I
>> >> am probably one of the very few people on this list who can make that
>> >> statement in complete and full honesty.
>> >>
>> >> I have never received money or consideration from any of the major
>> >> players.  Oddly enough, I was contracted last year for a programming
>> >> job by an alt.root operator, but that was done despite the fact that
>> >> publicly I have always, and continue to, oppose most of their
>> >> positions on these forums.
>> >>
>> >> I do not accept money that has any strings attached, and I've always
>> >> made that clear.  Despite my public positions, that operator has
>> >> continued to hire me for occasional work they need done.
>> >>
>> >> So you can try and disparage me and my motives, and try and convince
>> >> others that I am some paid operative, but the facts are absolutely
>> >> against you.
>> >>
>> >> Some advice, though, Eric.  The GA list rules are on the website.  Be
>> >> careful what you say about people and how you say it when you post to
>> >> the list.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com
>>
>> > --
>> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com



-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>